Negligent security cases arise when an individual is harmed due to inadequate security measures on someone else’s property. In Florida, the legal framework governing these cases revolves around the principles of premises liability, which hold property owners and managers responsible for ensuring the safety of those who enter their premises. When security measures fail and result in harm, determining liability becomes a complex task that involves examining the roles and responsibilities of various parties. This comprehensive guide delves into who can be held liable in a negligent security case in Florida, shedding light on the intricacies of the law and the responsibilities of different entities.
Property Owners and Managers
The primary responsibility for maintaining a safe environment typically rests with the property owner or the entity managing the property. Whether it’s a commercial establishment like a shopping mall, an apartment complex, a hotel, or even a private residence, the owner or manager is expected to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm. This includes implementing adequate security measures such as lighting, surveillance cameras, security personnel, and access controls. Failure to do so can result in liability if it is proven that the lack of proper security measures directly contributed to an incident where someone was harmed.
For instance, if an apartment complex has a history of criminal activity in the vicinity and the property manager fails to install security cameras or hire security personnel, they can be held liable if a resident or visitor is attacked on the premises. The key factor here is foreseeability. If the risk of harm was foreseeable and the property owner or manager did nothing to mitigate it, they can be held responsible for the resulting injuries.
Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice & Purtz, P.A. offers four attorneys who are board certified by the Florida bar in civil trial law, business litigation and construction law, as well as attorneys who are certified in civil trial advocacy by the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Security Companies
In many cases, property owners and managers hire third-party security companies to provide protective services. These companies are tasked with implementing security measures, monitoring the premises, and responding to incidents. When a security company fails to perform its duties adequately, leading to harm, it can be held liable for negligence. This liability can arise from various issues such as improper training of security personnel, failure to monitor surveillance footage effectively, or not responding promptly to security breaches.
For example, if a security company is hired to patrol a shopping mall and an incident occurs due to the security personnel’s negligence or lack of training, the company can be held accountable. The injured party must demonstrate that the security company’s failure to fulfill its contractual obligations directly resulted in the harm suffered.
Tenants and Lessees
In certain situations, tenants or lessees of a property may also bear some responsibility for ensuring the safety of their patrons or guests. This is particularly relevant in commercial leases where the tenant operates a business on the premises. The tenant may be required to implement specific security measures as part of their lease agreement. Failure to comply with these requirements or neglecting to address known security risks can lead to liability.
Consider a nightclub operating in a leased space where the lease agreement stipulates that the tenant must provide adequate security. If the nightclub owner fails to hire enough security personnel or address known security vulnerabilities, and an incident occurs as a result, the tenant can be held liable for the injuries sustained by patrons. In such cases, the lease agreement and the specific responsibilities outlined within it play a crucial role in determining liability.
Contractors and Maintenance Providers
Sometimes, liability in negligent security cases extends to contractors and maintenance providers responsible for the upkeep of security systems and infrastructure. These entities are often hired to install, maintain, and repair security equipment such as cameras, alarms, and access control systems. If a contractor’s negligence in performing these tasks leads to a security failure and subsequent harm, they can be held liable.
For example, if a contractor fails to properly install or maintain security cameras in a hotel, and an incident occurs due to the lack of surveillance, the contractor can be held responsible. The injured party must prove that the contractor’s negligence directly contributed to the security lapse and resulting harm.
Excellent experience with very good results, I am very happy and satisfied with the Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice & Purtz law firm I, especially Mr. Christopher Smith who at all times during the process of my case was very honest, correct and efficient. I highly recommend this firm and this attorney because they really made a big difference to the results in my case. Attorney Purtz and the entire staff have been wonderful. They went above and beyond. Highly recommended! This law firm is awesome. They were very thorough and attention to detail. If you have any issues that need quick results this is the one. Please always think of them for all your lawyer needs. Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice and Purtz, PA was the only law firm who would take our car accident case. Andrea Pleimling Smith was very thorough, explained everything in a very detailed fashion, and was easy to reach when questions arose. She kept us informed every step of the way. Without her, we would have suffered a severe financial loss due to an accident which was not our fault. Florida’s No Fault law is terrible and very unfair. Andrea and her team were very helpful in recouping all of the money we were required to spend! Thank you again for everything you did for me. Your compassion and concern was greatly appreciated. I have all the faith in the world with you by my side. If ever I know someone who needs an attorney, I will recommend your office. Everyone I had dealings with was very professional. Good job. We have used Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice & Purtz in the past and presently and they always provide great customer service. They are very knowledgeable and thorough in their representation and always go the extra mile to make sure we’re represented fairly. Highly recommend!
“Excellent experience!”
Sergio-Leydi C.
“Wonderful”
Burton P.
“This law firm is awesome!”
John W.
“Accident Case”
Karen and David B.
“Thank you again for everything”
Terri D.
“Great Service”
Nick A.
Third Parties and Criminal Actors
While the primary focus in negligent security cases is often on property owners, managers, and security providers, there are instances where third parties or the criminal actors themselves can be held liable. This typically involves situations where the perpetrator of the crime is identifiable and can be pursued legally. In such cases, the criminal actor can be held liable for the harm they caused. However, pursuing claims against criminals can be challenging, as they may not have the financial resources to compensate the victims adequately.
In some cases, third parties whose actions contributed to the security breach can also be held liable. For instance, if a delivery company leaves a gate open, allowing unauthorized access to a secure area, and a crime occurs as a result, the delivery company may be held responsible for its negligence.
Insurance Companies
Insurance companies play a significant role in negligent security cases, particularly in terms of providing compensation to the injured party. Property owners, managers, and security companies typically carry insurance policies that cover liability for incidents occurring on their premises. When a negligent security claim is filed, the insurance company may be responsible for covering the damages awarded to the injured party. However, dealing with insurance companies can be complex, as they often seek to minimize payouts.
Victims of negligent security incidents may face challenges in negotiating with insurance companies, which is why legal representation is crucial. An experienced attorney can help navigate the claims process, negotiate with insurance adjusters, and ensure that the victim receives fair compensation for their injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
The Role of Comparative Negligence
Florida follows the legal doctrine of comparative negligence, which can significantly impact negligent security cases. Comparative negligence means that the court will apportion fault among all parties involved, including the victim. This can affect the amount of compensation the victim receives. For instance, if the court determines that the victim was partially responsible for their own harm, their compensation may be reduced by their percentage of fault.
For example, if a victim was attacked in a poorly lit parking lot but was also intoxicated and not paying attention to their surroundings, the court may find that the victim was 20% at fault. In such a case, the total damages awarded would be reduced by 20%, reflecting the victim’s share of responsibility. It is essential for victims to work with attorneys who can effectively argue against undue blame and ensure that they receive the maximum compensation possible.
Steps to Take if You Are a Victim of Negligent Security
If you or a loved one has been injured due to negligent security, there are crucial steps you should take to protect your rights and build a strong case. First, seek immediate medical attention for any injuries sustained. Documenting your injuries and receiving prompt medical care is essential for your health and for establishing a clear link between the incident and your injuries.
Next, report the incident to the property owner or manager. Ensure that an official report is filed and obtain a copy for your records. Gather as much evidence as possible from the scene, including photographs, witness statements, and any surveillance footage if available. This evidence can be vital in proving the negligence of the property owner or manager.
It is also crucial to avoid making any statements to insurance companies or signing any documents without consulting an attorney. Insurance companies may try to settle quickly for an amount that does not adequately cover your damages. An experienced attorney can guide you through the process, protect your rights, and help you secure fair compensation.
Contact Us Today
Navigating a negligent security case requires a deep understanding of premises liability law and the ability to prove negligence on the part of the responsible parties. The legal team at Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice & Purtz, P.A. has extensive experience handling complex negligent security cases in Florida. Our attorneys are committed to providing compassionate and effective legal representation to victims who have suffered due to inadequate security measures.
We understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll that such incidents can take on victims and their families. Our team will thoroughly investigate your case, gather evidence, and work tirelessly to hold the negligent parties accountable. We will also handle all negotiations with insurance companies to ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a negligent security incident, do not hesitate to contact Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice & Purtz, P.A. Our dedicated attorneys are here to provide you with the legal support and guidance you need during this challenging time. Contact us today for a free consultation and take the first step towards securing the justice and compensation you deserve.